Skip to main content

Start Here: Technical Reference in 2026

This site is now focused on practical AI engineering: agents, MCP, frameworks, security, ethics, and product delivery.

Technical Reference 2026 cover

If you are building with AI and need practical, implementation-first guidance, this site is for you.

Technical Reference is now focused on modern AI engineering with one rule:

Useful in production beats impressive in demos.

What you will find here

  1. AI agent architecture and MCP integration guides.
  2. Framework comparisons that include trade-offs, not marketing claims.
  3. Security and ethics checklists for real delivery contexts.
  4. Vibe coding workflows with reliability guardrails.
  5. AI + insurance applied patterns.
  6. Idea-to-product execution playbooks.

How to use this site

  • Start with implementation guides.
  • Use comparison posts to choose a stack.
  • Apply checklists before release.
  • Revisit trend posts as the ecosystem changes.

Publishing rhythm

  • Tuesday: technical implementation guide.
  • Friday: strategic comparison, trend, or case-based post.

What to read next

  1. AI Agents + MCP: A Practical Architecture Pattern.
  2. AI Security and Ethics Checklist for Engineering Teams.
  3. Vibe Coding with Guardrails: Ship Fast Without Breaking Trust.

If this was useful, consider bookmarking this post or sharing it with someone who'd benefit.

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

AI Evaluation Harness: From Prompt Tests to Production Release Gates

A practical framework for building an AI evaluation harness that links test quality to release decisions and operational confidence. Evaluation harnesses turn subjective model quality into measurable release criteria. Combine functional, safety, latency, and cost checks into one pipeline. Block releases when critical thresholds are missed, even under delivery pressure. If your AI release decision is based on a demo, you are not releasing engineering software; you are releasing a hope strategy. A proper evaluation harness creates repeatable evidence for quality, safety, and cost trade-offs. Prerequisites Versioned prompts and model configuration. Representative test dataset by use case. CI/CD pipeline with artefact retention. Clear service-level objectives for latency and reliability. Evaluation layers 1) Functional correctness Golden set response checks. Tool invocation correctness. Schema compliance for structured outputs. 2) Safety and policy Prompt in...
Post a Comment
Read more

AI Agents and MCP in Production: A Practical Architecture Pattern

A practical architecture for building AI agents with MCP, including boundaries, observability, and failure handling. AI agents are moving from demos to production systems, and MCP is quickly becoming a common protocol for tool and context integration. This guide covers a practical baseline architecture. Why this matters now As of 2025-2026, MCP support and agent workflows have expanded across major ecosystems, and teams need interoperable patterns rather than provider lock-in. Baseline architecture Orchestrator layer : plans tasks, manages tool calls, and handles retries. Model layer : reasoning/generation model with explicit prompt contracts. MCP tool layer : context servers for docs, repos, tickets, and internal systems. Policy layer : security rules, redaction, and allowed-tool boundaries. Observability layer : traces, token costs, tool latency, failure telemetry. Key design rules Treat MCP servers as untrusted inputs unless explicitly verified. Whitelist to...
Post a Comment
Read more

AI Agent Failure Modes: Detection, Triage, and Recovery Runbook

A practical incident runbook for AI agent systems, covering common failure modes and response actions that reduce production impact. Most agent incidents are predictable: tool misuse, context drift, and weak guardrails. Build a failure taxonomy and link each class to detection and recovery playbooks. Track MTTR and recurrence to continuously harden your agent platform. Agent systems do not fail in one way. They fail across planning, context, tool invocation, and execution boundaries. Without a clear runbook, teams lose time arguing about symptoms instead of restoring service. This guide provides an operating model you can implement immediately. Prerequisites Incident severity model (SEV1, SEV2, SEV3). On-call owner for agent platform. Baseline observability for prompts, tool calls, and outcomes. Rollback path for model and policy configuration. Failure taxonomy 1) Intent misclassification The agent chooses the wrong plan for a valid request. Signals: - Wrong w...
Post a Comment
Read more