Technical Reference | AI Engineering Playbooks

Side‑by‑side look at emerging agent orchestration frameworks. Side‑by‑side look at emerging agent orchestration frameworks. Offers clarity for technical decision‑making and integration plans. Includes controls, pitfalls, and a phased implementation path. Side‑by‑side look at emerging agent orchestration frameworks. Why this matters Teams are under pressure to deliver AI capability quickly, but speed without control creates operational and governance risk. This guide focuses on practical execution patterns that hold up in production. Prerequisites Clear ownership for delivery and risk decisions. Baseline observability for model and tool behaviour. Defined quality and security acceptance criteria. Practical approach Define the business decision this capability supports. Limit the first release scope to one workflow and one owner. Add measurable controls for quality, latency, and failure handling. Roll out with explicit monitoring and rollback paths. Implemen...

A practical architecture for building AI agents with MCP, including boundaries, observability, and failure handling. AI agents are moving from demos to production systems, and MCP is quickly becoming a common protocol for tool and context integration. This guide covers a practical baseline architecture. Why this matters now As of 2025-2026, MCP support and agent workflows have expanded across major ecosystems, and teams need interoperable patterns rather than provider lock-in. Baseline architecture Orchestrator layer : plans tasks, manages tool calls, and handles retries. Model layer : reasoning/generation model with explicit prompt contracts. MCP tool layer : context servers for docs, repos, tickets, and internal systems. Policy layer : security rules, redaction, and allowed-tool boundaries. Observability layer : traces, token costs, tool latency, failure telemetry. Key design rules Treat MCP servers as untrusted inputs unless explicitly verified. Whitelist to...